Rumi Squad and our self-centered politics

Niloy at BIRDEM. Source: Facebook

Part I: by Asif Mohiuddin:

Our opportunistic politics haven’t been able to ban Jamaat. Instead, the rotten politics of compromises continues to court and feed Jamaat and Shibir. By playing for and against Jamaat, the two main opposing political parties have filled up their vote banks, but to this date no acceptable decision has been reached regarding Jamaat. I joined the Shahbag movement with much hope, only to witness a section of the protestors turn into seasoned politicians overnight. They mastered the rotten politics of opportunism with amazing speed. The boys of the Shaheed Rumi Squad haven’t yet learned the politics of opportunism, their eyes are still filled with the dreams of a green Bangladesh, and full of secular and progressive enthusiasm.

I hope people haven’t forgotten those who supported the Shahbag movement in its early days. In those days a few famous people, well-known as ring-leaders of the Awami League, tried to spread various rumors about the movement: that it is a movement aligned with the Chinese Left, or that it is the Shahbag matha movement, or that it’s a Jamaati propaganda to call into question the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT). However, in a few days these same people did a complete turn around, and then I saw them verging on martyrdom while giving interviews on the television channels. They had suddenly became self-appointed leaders of the movement. In the interest of the movement and for the sake of unity I had remained mum, accepted everything.

The call to join the hunger strike came from Niloy of the Shaheed Rumi Squad.  I remember, even the other day he and I had hung out, chatting all night at Shahbag. Now, the Awami ring-leaders are calling him the son of Bazlul Huda, that self-proclaimed murderer of Bongobondhu Sheik Mujibur Rahman!

How astounding! I feel such despair! Even the likes of Delwar Hossain Sayedee, Motiur Rahman Nizami and Golam Azam, or even the Satan himself must be put to shame by such outrageous lies! These few young men who are on hunger strike, they are being intimidated in different ways by different groups. These boys are our people and our friends. We may not support their cause, but how can we tolerate such deceitful back-stabbings of by those claiming to be pro-liberation war forces?

Part II: by Durjodhan Durjodhan

At this moment you or I are acting in very self-centered ways. I am sitting in an air-conditioned room watching the sports channel, washing down mouthfuls of sandwich with gulps of coffee. In mean time you may be hanging out with friends, laughing your head off, or sitting down with your children in some fancy restaurant, or maybe getting ready to go out to a dinner party. We are all busy with ourselves. Perhaps, we even managed to drop by Shahbag a couple of times to express our solidarity with them — besides the photo sessions, had a few awesome addas — afterwards we congratulated ourselves, yes! it is fun to take part in the revolution.

On the other side, nine young men are sitting in front of the Museum gate, starving themselves. They too have families. They too have friends. They too have the right to enjoy their own time. Yet they have put on hold all the commitments of their personal lives to take part in a hunger strike in front of the Museum gate in Shahbag. They are fasting because they believe in and want to ensure the demand of the people and the Gonojagoron Mancha for the death penalty of the war-criminals. We are telling them – “We are with you”. But we haven’t been selfless enough to do anything more than just that. Shame on ourselves! Shame on our propensity to sidestepping and avoid getting involved.

At the same time we see that the media is failing to focus on the news of these hunger striking youths. The media must find such news to be very cliche compared to the news of how Katrina’s pink dress got ruined by the blue dye of Holi, or the news of divorce of the film stars Jalil and Borsha. Even the bed-hoppings of that world-class shameless philanderer, H.M. Ershad, is big news to our media but the hunger strike of these nine youths in order to wash away the garbage of 42 years is not deemed to be political news. Even the news of the hanging of the two bulls who went on a crops destroying rampage is more important than the news of nine patriotic youths fasting to demand the death penalty of Razakaars.

Part III: by Anu Muhammad

The Minister of Home Affairs, who has been too incompetent to ensure the safety of the people and their possessions, has made yet another utterly irresponsible statement: “Trouble-makers will be shot on sight.”

What is the problem with arresting someone who is causing trouble in sight or in the range of fire? If you kill them how will you know who is behind them? And why should we believe you when you kill someone and say “He was trying to cause trouble”?

Starting in 2002 with the BNP-Jamaat government, after that the caretaker government and now the current government have all perpetrated state-backed murders, accompanied with false press notes labeling these incidents as “cross-fires” or “encounters”. Governments change but the false press notes remain. After murdering them the victims are being made to wear “terrorist” tags around their necks. Meanwhile the real terrorists and their godfathers keep themselves attached to the government’s side and to do their dirty deeds.

***

ā§§. āφāϏāĻŋāĻĢ āĻŽāĻšāĻŋāωāĻĻā§āĻĻā§€āύ

āφāĻŽāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āϏ⧁āĻŦāĻŋāϧāĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āϰāĻžāϜāύ⧀āϤāĻŋ āϜāĻžāĻŽāĻžāϤ āĻļāĻŋāĻŦāĻŋāϰ āύāĻŋāώāĻŋāĻĻā§āϧ āĻ•āϰāϤ⧇ āĻĒāĻžāϰ⧇ āύāĻŋāĨ¤ āφāĻŽāĻžāĻĻ⧇āĻ°Â āĻ­ā§āϰāĻˇā§āϟ āϰāĻžāϜāύ⧀āϤāĻŋ, āφāĻĒā§‹āώ⧇āϰ āϰāĻžāϜāύ⧀āϤāĻŋ āĻŦāϰāĻžā§āϚ āϜāĻžāĻŽāĻžāϤ āĻļāĻŋāĻŦāĻŋāϰāϕ⧇ āϞāĻžāϞāύ āĻĒāĻžāϞāύ āĻ•āϰ⧇āϛ⧇āĨ¤Â āϜāĻžāĻŽāĻžāϤ⧇āϰ āĻĒāĻ•ā§āώ⧇ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĒāĻ•ā§āώ⧇ āĻŦāĻŋāĻ­āĻ•ā§āϤ āĻšāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻĻ⧁āĻŸā§‹ āĻĒā§āϰāϧāĻžāύ āĻŦāĻŋāϰ⧋āϧ⧀ āĻĻāϞāχ āĻ­ā§‹āĻŸā§‡āϰ āĻŦāĻžāĻ•ā§āĻ¸Â āĻĒ⧁āĻ°ā§āĻŖ āĻ•āϰ⧇āϛ⧇, āĻ•āĻŋāĻ¨ā§āϤ⧁ āϜāĻžāĻŽāĻžāϤ⧇āϰ āĻŦāĻŋāϰ⧁āĻĻā§āϧ⧇ āφāϜ āĻĒāĻ°ā§āϝāĻ¨ā§āϤ āϕ⧋āύ āĻ—ā§āϰāĻšāĻŖāϝ⧋āĻ—ā§āĻ¯Â āϏāĻŋāĻĻā§āϧāĻžāĻ¨ā§āϤ āύ⧇āϝāĻŧāĻž āĻšāϝāĻŧ āύāĻŋāĨ¤ āĻ…āύ⧇āĻ• āφāĻļāĻž āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻļāĻžāĻšāĻŦāĻžāϗ⧇ āφāĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§‹āϞāύ āĻ•āϰ⧇āĻ›āĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽ, āĻ•āĻŋāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§Â āφāĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§‹āϞāύāĻ•āĻžāϰ⧀āĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻāĻ•āĻžāĻ‚āĻļ āϰāĻžāϤāĻžāϰāĻžāϤāĻŋ āĻāĻ• āĻāĻ•āϜāύ āĻĒāĻžāĻ•ā§āĻ•āĻž āϰāĻžāϜāύ⧀āϤāĻŋāĻŦāĻŋāĻĻ āĻŦāύ⧇ āϗ⧇āϞ⧇āύāĨ¤Â āϏ⧁āĻŦāĻŋāϧāĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻĻ āφāϰ āĻ­ā§āϰāĻˇā§āϟ āϰāĻžāϜāύ⧀āϤāĻŋāϰ āϖ⧇āϞāĻž āϤāĻžāϰāĻžāĻ“ āĻĻā§āϰ⧁āϤ āĻ—āϤāĻŋāϤ⧇ āĻļāĻŋāϖ⧇ āĻĢ⧇āϞāϞ⧇āύāĨ¤ āĻļāĻšā§€āĻĻ āϰ⧁āĻŽāĻŋ āĻ¸ā§āϕ⧋āϝāĻŧāĻžāĻĄā§‡āϰ āϛ⧇āϞ⧇āϰāĻž āĻāĻ–āύāĻ“ āϏ⧁āĻŦāĻŋāϧāĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āϰāĻžāϜāύ⧀āϤāĻŋ āĻļ⧇āϖ⧇āύāĻŋ, āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻšā§‹āϖ⧇ āĻāĻ–āύāĻ“Â āϏāĻŦ⧁āϜ āĻŦāĻžāĻ™āϞāĻžāĻĻ⧇āĻļ⧇āϰ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻĒā§āύ, āĻ…āϏāĻžāĻŽā§āĻĒā§āϰāĻĻāĻžāϝāĻŧāĻŋāĻ• āĻĒā§āϰāĻ—āϤāĻŋāĻļā§€āϞ āϚāĻŋāĻ¨ā§āϤāĻžāĻšā§‡āϤāύāĻžāϰ āωāĻĻā§āϝ⧋āĻŽāĨ¤

āĻļāĻžāĻšāĻŦāĻžāĻ— āφāĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§‹āϞāύ⧇āϰ āĻļ⧁āϰ⧁āϤ⧇ āĻ•āĻžāϰāĻž āĻ•āĻžāϰāĻž āĻāχ āφāĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§‹āϞāύāϕ⧇ āϏāĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĨāύ āĻĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇āĻ›āĻŋāϞ, āϏāĻŦāĻžāĻ‡Â āύāĻŋāĻļā§āϚāϝāĻŧāχ āϭ⧁āϞ⧇ āϝāĻžāύ āύāĻžāχāĨ¤ āϤāĻ–āύ āĻĒāĻžāĻĄāĻŧ āφāĻ“āϝāĻŧāĻžāĻŽā§€ āĻĒāĻžāĻŖā§āĻĄāĻž āύāĻžāĻŽā§‡ āĻ–ā§āϝāĻžāϤ āĻ•āϝāĻŧ⧇āĻ•āϜāύ āĻŦāĻŋāĻ–ā§āϝāĻžāĻ¤Â āϞ⧋āĻ• āĻāχ āφāĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§‹āϞāύāϕ⧇ āĻšā§€āύāĻž āĻŦāĻžāĻŽ āϧāĻžāϰāĻžāϰ āφāĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§‹āϞāύ āĻŦāĻž āĻļāĻžāĻšāĻŦāĻžāϗ⧇āϰ āĻŽāĻžāĻ āĻž āφāĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§‹āϞāύ āĻŦāĻžÂ āĻŸā§āϰāĻžāχāĻŦ⧁āύāĻžāϞāϕ⧇ āĻĒā§āϰāĻļā§āύāĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āϧ āĻ•āϰāĻžāϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝ āϜāĻžāĻŽāĻžāϤāĻŋ āĻĒā§āϰāĻĒāĻžāĻ—āĻžāĻŖā§āĻĄāĻž āĻŦāϞ⧇ āĻĒā§āϰāϚāĻžāĻ°Â āĻ•āϰ⧇āĻ›āĻŋāϞ⧇āύāĨ¤ āĻ āĻŋāĻ• āĻ•āϝāĻŧ⧇āĻ•āĻĻāĻŋāύ⧇āϰ āĻŽāĻ§ā§āϝ⧇ āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻ­ā§‹āϞ āĻŦ⧇āĻŽāĻžāϞ⧁āĻŽ āĻĒāĻžāϞāĻŸā§‡ āϗ⧇āϞ, āĻāϰāĻĒāĻ°ā§‡Â āĻĻ⧇āĻ–āϞāĻžāĻŽ āϤāĻžāϰāĻž āϟāĻŋāĻ­āĻŋ āĻšā§āϝāĻžāύ⧇āϞ⧇ āĻ—āĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āϏāĻžāĻ•ā§āώāĻžāϤāĻ•āĻžāϰ āĻĻāĻŋāϤ⧇ āĻĻāĻŋāϤ⧇ āĻĒā§āϰāĻžāϝāĻŧ āĻļāĻšā§€āĻĻ āĻšāϝāĻŧā§‡Â āϗ⧇āϞ⧇āύāĨ¤ āφāĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§‹āϞāύ⧇āϰ āĻšāĻ°ā§āϤāĻžāĻ•āĻ°ā§āϤāĻž āĻŦāύ⧇ āϗ⧇āϞ⧇āύ; āφāĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§‹āϞāύ⧇āϰ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĨ⧇, āϐāĻ•ā§āϝ⧇āĻ°Â āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĨ⧇ āφāĻŽāϰāĻž āϏāĻŦāĻžāχ āϚ⧁āĻĒ āĻ•āϰ⧇ āϗ⧇āϞāĻžāĻŽāĨ¤ āϏāĻŦ āĻ•āĻŋāϛ⧁ āĻŽā§‡āύ⧇ āύāĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽ!

āĻļāĻšā§€āĻĻ āϰ⧁āĻŽāĻŋ āĻ¸ā§āϕ⧋āϝāĻŧāĻžāĻĄā§‡āϰ āĻ…āύāĻļāύāĻ•āĻžāϰ⧀ āύāĻŋāϞāϝāĻŧ, āϏ⧇āχ āĻ…āύāĻļāύ⧇āϰ āĻĄāĻžāĻ• āĻĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇āϛ⧇āĨ¤ āĻāχ āϏ⧇āĻĻāĻŋāύāĻ“Â āϏāĻžāϰāĻžāϰāĻžāϤ āĻļāĻžāĻšāĻŦāĻžāϗ⧇ āĻŦāϏ⧇ āφāĻŽāϰāĻž āφāĻĄā§āĻĄāĻž āĻĻāĻŋāĻšā§āĻ›āĻŋāϞāĻžāĻŽāĨ¤ āϤāĻžāϕ⧇ āĻ…āύāϞāĻžāχāύ āφāĻ“āϝāĻŧāĻžāĻŽā§€ āĻĒāĻžāĻŖā§āĻĄāĻžāĻ°Â āĻļ⧇āώāĻŽā§‡āώ āĻŦāĻžāύāĻžāϞ⧋ āĻŦāĻ™ā§āĻ—āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āϧ⧁ āϖ⧁āύ⧀ āĻŦāϜāϞ⧁āϞ āĻšā§āĻĻāĻžāϰ āϛ⧇āϞ⧇!

āϕ⧀ āφāĻļā§āϚāĻ°ā§āϝ! āφāĻŽāĻŋ āĻšāϤāĻžāĻļāĨ¤ āĻŽāĻŋāĻĨā§āϝāĻžāϚāĻžāϰ⧇āϰ āĻāχ āύāĻŽā§āύāĻž āĻĻ⧇āĻ–āϞ⧇ āϏāĻžāχāĻĻā§€ āύāĻŋāϜāĻžāĻŽā§€ āĻ—ā§‹āϞāĻžāĻŽÂ āφāϜāĻŽ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ–ā§‹āĻĻ āĻļāϝāĻŧāϤāĻžāύāĻ“ āύāĻŋāĻļā§āϚāϝāĻŧāχ āϞāĻœā§āϜāĻž āĻĒ⧇āϝāĻŧ⧇ āϝāĻžāĻŦ⧇āĨ¤ āĻ•āϝāĻŧ⧇āĻ•āϜāύ āϤāϰ⧁āĻŖ āύāĻž āϖ⧇āϝāĻŧ⧇ āφāϛ⧇, āĻ…āύāĻļāύ āĻ•āϰāϛ⧇, āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āύāĻžāύāĻž āĻĒāĻ•ā§āώ āĻĨ⧇āϕ⧇ āύāĻžāύāĻž āϧāϰāϪ⧇āϰ āĻ­āϝāĻŧ āĻ­ā§€āϤāĻŋ āĻĻ⧇āĻ–āĻžāύ⧋ āĻšāĻšā§āϛ⧇āĨ¤ āϤāĻžāϰāĻžÂ āφāĻŽāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰāχ āϞ⧋āĻ•, āφāĻŽāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰāχ āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āϧ⧁āĨ¤ āφāĻŽāϰāĻž āϏāĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĨāύ āĻ•āϰāϤ⧇ āύāĻž āĻĒāĻžāϰāĻŋ, āĻ•āĻŋāĻ¨ā§āϤ⧁ āĻāĻ­āĻžāĻŦā§‡Â āĻĒāĻŋāϠ⧇ āĻŽāĻŋāĻĨā§āϝāĻžāϚāĻžāϰ⧇āϰ āϛ⧁āϰāĻŋ āĻŽāĻžāϰāĻž āϕ⧀āĻ­āĻžāĻŦ⧇ āϏāĻŽā§āĻ­āĻŦ āϕ⧋āύ āĻŽā§āĻ•ā§āϤāĻŋāϝ⧁āĻĻā§āϧ⧇āϰ āϏāĻĒāĻ•ā§āώ⧇āĻ°Â āĻļāĻ•ā§āϤāĻŋāϰ āĻĻāĻžāĻŦā§€āĻĻāĻžāϰ⧇āϰ āĻ•āĻžāĻ› āĻĨ⧇āϕ⧇?

⧍. āĻĻā§‚āĻ°ā§āϝ⧋āϧāύ āĻĻā§‚āĻ°ā§āϝ⧋āϧāύ

āĻāχ āĻŽā§‚āĻšā§āĻ°ā§āϤ⧇ āφāĻŽāĻŋ āĻŦāĻž āφāĻĒāύāĻŋ āĻĒā§āϰāϚāĻ¨ā§āĻĄ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĨāĻĒāϰ⧇āϰ āĻŽāϤ āφāϚāϰāύ āĻ•āϰāĻ›āĻŋ āĨ¤ āφāĻŽāĻŋ āĻāϏāĻŋāĻ¤ā§‡Â āĻŦāϏ⧇ āϖ⧇āϞāĻžāϰ āĻšā§āϝāĻžāύ⧇āϞ āĻĻ⧇āĻ–āĻ›āĻŋ,āĻ•āĻĢāĻŋ āĻ—āĻŋāϞāϤ⧇ āĻ—āĻŋāϞāϤ⧇ āĻ¸ā§āϝāĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻĄāωāχāĻšā§‡ āĻ•āĻžāĻŽāĻĄāĻŧ āĻŦāϏāĻžāĻšā§āĻ›āĻŋ āĨ¤Â āφāĻĒāύāĻŋ āĻšāϝāĻŧāϤ⧋ āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āϧ⧁āĻĻ⧇āϰ āϏāĻžāĻĨ⧇ āφāĻĄā§āĻĄāĻž āĻŽāĻžāϰāϤ⧇ āĻŽāĻžāϰāϤ⧇ āĻšāĻžāϏāĻŋāϤ⧇ āϞ⧁āϟāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧāϛ⧇āύ , āϏāĻ¨ā§āϤāĻžāĻ¨Â āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āϖ⧇āϤ⧇ āĻŦāϏ⧇āϛ⧇āύ āĻ…āĻ­āĻŋāϜāĻžāϤ āϰ⧇āĻ¸ā§āϟ⧁āϰ⧇āĻ¨ā§āĻŸā§‡ , āĻ…āĻĨāĻŦāĻž āĻĒā§āϰāĻ¸ā§āϤ⧁āϤāĻŋ āύāĻŋāĻšā§āϛ⧇āύ āĻĻāĻžāĻ“āϝāĻŧāĻžāĻ¤ā§‡Â āϝāĻžāĻ“āϝāĻŧāĻžāϰ āĨ¤ āύāĻŋāĻœā§‡āĻĻ⧇āϰ āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻŦā§āϝāĻ¸ā§āϤ āφāĻŽāϰāĻž āϏāĻŦāĻžāχāχ āĨ¤ āĻāϰ āĻŽāĻžāĻā§‡āĻ“ āĻšāϝāĻŧāϤ⧋ āĻĻ⧁āϝāĻŧ⧇āĻ•āĻĻāĻŋāĻ¨Â āĻļāĻžāĻšāĻŦāĻžāϗ⧇ āĻ—āĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻāĻ•āĻžāĻ¤ā§āĻŽāϤāĻž āϜāĻžāύāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻāϏ⧇āĻ›āĻŋ – āĻĢāĻŸā§‹āϏ⧇āĻļāĻžāύ⧇āϰ āĻĒāĻžāĻļāĻžāĻĒāĻžāĻļāĻŋ āφāĻĄā§āĻĄāĻžāĻ“ āĻšāϝāĻŧ⧇āĻ›ā§‡Â āϜāĻŽā§āĻĒ⧇āĻļ – āĻŽāύāϕ⧇ āĻŦāϞāĻž āĻšāϝāĻŧ⧇āϛ⧇ ‘āĻœā§‹āϏ āĻāĻ•āϟāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāĻĒā§āϞāĻŦ āĻ•āϰāϞāĻžāĻŽ āĻŽāĻžāĻŽā§āĻŽāĻž ‘!

āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āϝāĻĻāĻŋāϕ⧇ āĻāĻ–āύ āϜāĻžāĻĻ⧁āϘāϰ⧇āϰ āϗ⧇āĻŸā§‡āϰ āϏāĻžāĻŽāύ⧇ āύāĻž āϖ⧇āϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻŦāϏ⧇ āφāϛ⧇ ⧝ āϜāύ āϤāϰ⧁āύ āĨ¤ āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰāĻ“Â āĻĒāϰāĻŋāĻŦāĻžāϰ āφāϛ⧇ āĨ¤ āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰāĻ“ āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āϧ⧁ āφāϛ⧇ āĨ¤ āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰāĻ“ āφāϛ⧇ āύāĻŋāĻœā§‡āĻĻ⧇āϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝ āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧ āωāĻĒāĻ­ā§‹āĻ— āĻ•āϰāĻžāĻ°Â āĻ…āϧāĻŋāĻ•āĻžāϰ āĨ¤ āύāĻŋāĻœā§‡āϰ āĻŦā§āϝāĻ¸ā§āϤ āĻœā§€āĻŦāύ⧇āϰ āĻ•āĻĨāĻž āĻŽāĻžāĻĨāĻž āĻĨ⧇āϕ⧇ āϏāϰāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āϤāĻžāϰāĻž āĻ…āύāĻļāύ⧇ āφāĻ›ā§‡Â āĻļāĻžāĻšāĻŦāĻžāϗ⧇āϰ āϜāĻžāĻĻ⧁āϘāϰ⧇āϰ āϗ⧇āĻŸā§‡āϰ āϏāĻžāĻŽāύ⧇ āĨ¤ āϤāĻžāϰāĻž āĻ—āύāϜāĻžāĻ—āϰāύ āĻŽāĻžā§āĻšā§‡āϰ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āϜāύāϤāĻžāϰ āĻĻāĻžāĻŦā§€ ‘āϝ⧁āĻĻā§āϧāĻžāĻĒāϰāĻžāϧ⧀āϰ āĻĢāĻžāρāϏāĻŋ āϚāĻžāĻ‡â€™- āĻ āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āĻŦāĻžāϏ āĻ•āϰ⧇ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āϏ⧇āχ āĻĻāĻžāĻŦā§€ āφāĻĻāĻžāϝāĻŧ⧇āϰ āωāĻĻā§āĻĻ⧇āĻļā§āϝ⧇āĻ‡Â āĻāĻ–āύ āĻ…āύāĻļāύ⧇ āĻŦāϏ⧇ āφāϛ⧇ āĨ¤ āφāĻŽāϰāĻž āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻŦāϞāĻ›āĻŋ – āϏāĻžāĻĨ⧇ āφāĻ›āĻŋ āĨ¤ āĻāϰ āĻŦ⧇āĻļāĻŋ āĻ•āĻŋāϛ⧁ āĻ•āϰāĻžāϰ āĻŽāĻ¤Â āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĨāĻšā§€āĻŖ āĻšāϤ⧇ āĻĒāĻžāϰāĻŋāύāĻŋ āϕ⧇āω āĨ¤ āϧāĻŋāĻ• āφāĻŽāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ , āϧāĻŋāĻ• āĻāχ āφāĻŽāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻĒāĻžāĻļ āĻ•āĻžāϟāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āϚāϞāĻžāĻ°Â āĻĒā§āϰāĻŦāύāϤāĻžāϕ⧇ āĨ¤

āĻāĻ•āχāϏāĻžāĻĨ⧇ āĻĻ⧇āĻ–āĻŋ āĻŽāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻž āĻĢā§‹āĻ•āĻžāϏ āĻ•āϰ⧇ āύāĻž āĻāχ āϤāϰ⧁āύāϗ⧁āϞ⧋āϰ āĻ…āύāĻļāύ⧇āϰ āĻ–āĻŦāϰ āĨ¤ āĻ•ā§āϝāĻžāϟāϰāĻŋāύāĻžāĻ°Â āĻ—ā§‹āϞāĻžāĻĒā§€ āĻ•āĻžāĻĒāĻĄāĻŧ⧇ āύ⧀āϞ āϰāĻ™ā§āϗ⧇āϰ āĻšā§‹āϞāĻŋāϰ āĻĻāĻžāϗ⧇ āύāĻˇā§āϟ āĻšāϝāĻŧ⧇ āϝāĻžāĻ“āϝāĻŧāĻž āĻ…āĻĨāĻŦāĻž āϜāϞāĻŋāϞ āĻŦāĻ°ā§āώāĻžāĻ°Â āĻŦāĻŋāĻŦāĻžāĻš āĻŦāĻŋāĻšā§āϛ⧇āĻĻ⧇āϰ āϤ⧁āϞāύāĻžāϝāĻŧ āĻāχ āϤāϰ⧁āύāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻ…āύāĻļāύ⧇āϰ āϏāĻ‚āĻŦāĻžāĻĻ āĻŦāĻĄāĻŧāχ āĻ•ā§āϞāĻŋāĻļ⧇ āĨ¤Â āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āĻŦāĻŦ⧇āĻšāĻžāϝāĻŧāĻž āĻāϰāĻļāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻāĻ•āĻŦāĻžāϰ āĻāχ āϕ⧋āϞ⧇ āĻŦāϏ⧇ āφāĻŦāĻžāϰ āϐ āϕ⧋āϞ⧇ āϚāĻĄāĻŧāĻžāϰ āĻ–āĻŦāϰ āφāĻŽāĻžāĻĻ⧇āĻ°Â āĻŽāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻžāϰ āĻ•āĻžāϛ⧇ āĻŦāĻĄāĻŧ āϰāĻžāϜāύ⧈āϤāĻŋāĻ• āĻŦāĻŋāώāϝāĻŧ , āĻ…āĻĨāϚ ⧝ āϤāϰ⧁āύ⧇āϰ ā§Ē⧍ āĻŦāĻ›āϰ⧇āϰ āϜāĻžā§āϜāĻžāϞ āĻĻā§‚āϰ āĻ•āϰāĻžāĻ°Â āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝ āĻ…āύāĻļāύ āϰāĻžāϜāύ⧈āϤāĻŋāĻ• āϏāĻ‚āĻŦāĻžāĻĻ āύāϝāĻŧ āĨ¤ āĻĢāϏāϞ āύāĻˇā§āϟ āĻ•āϰāĻžāϝāĻŧ āĻĻ⧁āχ āώāĻžāρāĻĄāĻŧ⧇āϰ āĻĢāĻžāρāϏāĻŋāϰ āϏāĻ‚āĻŦāĻžāĻĻ ā§¯Â āϜāύ āĻĻ⧇āĻļāĻĒā§āϰ⧇āĻŽāĻŋāĻ• āϤāϰ⧁āύ⧇āϰ āϰāĻžāϜāĻžāĻ•āĻžāϰ⧇āϰ āĻĢāĻžāρāϏāĻŋāϰ āĻĻāĻžāĻŦā§€āϤ⧇ āύāĻž āϖ⧇āϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻŦāϏ⧇ āĻĨāĻžāĻ•āĻžāϰ āĻšā§‡āϝāĻŧā§‡Â āϗ⧁āϰ⧁āĻ¤ā§āĻŦāĻĒā§‚āĻ°ā§āύ āĻ–āĻŦāϰ āĨ¤

ā§Š. āφāύ⧁ āĻŽā§āĻšāĻžāĻŽā§āĻŽāĻĻ

āĻŽāĻžāύ⧁āώ āĻ“ āϏāĻŽā§āĻĒāĻĻ⧇āϰ āύāĻŋāϰāĻžāĻĒāĻ¤ā§āϤāĻž āĻĻāĻŋāϤ⧇ āĻŦā§āϝāĻ°ā§āĻĨ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāϰāĻžāĻˇā§āĻŸā§āϰāĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āϰ⧀ āφāϰ⧇āĻ•āϟāĻŋ āϚāϰāĻŽÂ āĻĻāĻžāϝāĻŧāĻŋāĻ¤ā§āĻŦāĻšā§€āύ āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āϤāĻŦā§āϝ āĻ•āϰ⧇āϛ⧇āύ, ‘āύāĻžāĻļāĻ•āϤāĻžāĻ•āĻžāϰ⧀āĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻĻ⧇āĻ–āĻžāĻŽāĻžāĻ¤ā§āϰ āϗ⧁āϞāĻŋ āĻ•āϰāĻž āĻšāĻŦ⧇āĨ¤â€™Â āĻĻ⧇āĻ–āĻžāϰ āĻŦāĻž āϗ⧁āϞāĻŋāϰ āϏ⧀āĻŽāĻžāύāĻžāϝāĻŧ āϕ⧇āω āϝāĻĻāĻŋ āύāĻžāĻļāĻ•āϤāĻž āĻ•āϰ⧇ āϤāĻžāĻšāϞ⧇ āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āϧāϰāϤ⧇ āĻ…āϏ⧁āĻŦāĻŋāϧāĻž āϕ⧀? āϗ⧁āϞāĻŋ āĻ•āϰ⧇ āĻŽā§‡āϰ⧇ āĻĢ⧇āϞāϞ⧇ āĻ•āĻžāϰāĻž āĻāχ āύāĻžāĻļāĻ•āϤāĻž āĻ•āϰāĻžāĻšā§āϛ⧇ āϤāĻž āϜāĻžāύāĻž āϝāĻžāĻŦ⧇ āϕ⧀āĻ­āĻžāĻŦ⧇? āφāϰ āφāĻĒāύāĻžāϰāĻž āĻ•āĻžāωāϕ⧇ āϖ⧁āύ āĻ•āϰ⧇ āϝāĻĻāĻŋ āĻŦāϞ⧇āύ ‘āĻ“Â āύāĻžāĻļāĻ•āϤāĻž āĻ•āϰāĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‹â€™, āϤāĻž āφāĻŽāϰāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āĻŦāĻžāϏ āĻ•āϰāĻŦā§‹ āϕ⧇āύ⧋? ⧍ā§Ļā§Ļ⧍ āϏāĻžāϞ āĻĨ⧇āϕ⧇ āĻŦāĻŋāĻāύāĻĒāĻŋ-āϜāĻžāĻŽāĻžāĻ¤Â āϏāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰ, āϤāĻ¤ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻŦāĻžāĻŦāϧāĻžāϝāĻŧāĻ• āϏāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰ āφāϰ āϏāĻ°ā§āĻŦāĻļ⧇āώ āĻŦāĻ°ā§āϤāĻŽāĻžāύ āϏāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰ āϏāĻŦāϗ⧁āϞ⧋ āφāĻŽāϞ⧇āχ āĻāĻ•āĻ‡Â āĻŽāĻŋāĻĨā§āϝāĻž āĻĒā§āϰ⧇āϏāύ⧋āϟ āĻĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻ•ā§āϰāϏāĻĢāĻžāϝāĻŧāĻžāϰ āĻ“ āĻāύāĻ•āĻžāωāĻ¨ā§āϟāĻžāϰ āύāĻžāĻŽā§‡ āϰāĻžāĻˇā§āĻŸā§āϰ⧀āϝāĻŧ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āϝāĻžāϝāĻœā§āĻžÂ āϚāϞ⧇āϛ⧇āĨ¤ āϏāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰ āĻŦāĻĻāϞāĻžāϝāĻŧ, āĻŽāĻŋāĻĨā§āϝāĻž āĻĒā§āϰ⧇āϏāύ⧋āϟ āĻŦāĻĻāϞāĻžāϝāĻŧ āύāĻžāĨ¤ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āϝāĻžāϰ āĻĒāϰ āύāĻŋāĻšāϤ⧇āϰ āϘāĻžāĻĄāĻŧā§‡Â āĻā§āϞāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āĻĻ⧇āϝāĻŧāĻž āĻšāϝāĻŧ ‘āϏāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āϰāĻžāĻ¸ā§€â€™ āĻĒāϰāĻŋāϚāϝāĻŧāĨ¤ āφāϰ āϏāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰ⧇āϰ āĻļāϰ⧀āϰ⧇ āϞ⧇āĻĒāĻŸā§‡ āĻĨ⧇āϕ⧇ āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āĻ°Â āĻ•āĻžāϜ āĻ•āϰāϤ⧇ āĻĨāĻžāϕ⧇ āϏāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āϰāĻžāϏ⧀ āĻ“ āϤāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻ—āĻĄāĻĢāĻžāĻĻāĻžāϰāϰāĻžāĨ¤

Source: ALAL O DULAL

1 COMMENT

  1. Young friends, you’ve yet to know our two big political parties, especially the AL. We used to be SL activists in our college days and know their root. You can persuade a blockhead by reasoning but you will surely fail to convince any AL or SL or other league activist even if you are a Newton or Einstein. What their top leader says, they are used to just echo that. They speak of democracy but that democracy must bear the tag of AL or that’s ‘against the spirit of liberation war’. In fact what the so-called ‘spirit’ actually is most of them perhaps don’t know. And our youths who only heard about the trauma of liberation war believe them without reasoning. And ignorance and arrogance crop out where reasoning is totally absent. Those youths who really want to learn what and how the liberation war was, must read history not since 1947 but from the time of Nawab Sirazuddoula. If not that much, at least since 1900.

Comments are closed.