by F R Chowdhury
The prime minister by her clever manipulation has already created so many groups and divisions. They are pro and anti on different issues – one against the other. When she is adamant to hold an election under her own government the opposition is determined not to allow any election under the present government. Most people want a free and fair election under a non-party care-taker government to be participated by all. The prime minister wants all the chaos and confusion to reach its peak so that she can call a snap election and declare herself victorious. The nation as a whole is worried about the political situation. They have seen lot of violence and destruction. They do not want any more of it. They want peace.
The prime minister has been all the time talking of endless development work done by her. She repeatedly said that her party would definitely win the mandate of the people again. If that is so, – then why is she so worried about a care-taker government? Her good work should bring her back to power. The moment she agrees to a care-taker government to conduct the election, all problems are solved. If she considered national interest above her personal and party interest, she should have agreed to this sensible proposal and thereby allow the peaceful continuation of the democratic process.
Unfortunately she again played a clever game. She hoodwinked the nation by proposing an all party interim government. Apparently she showed a gesture of flexibility. By this proposal she wants to divide the opposition parties – another clever trick. Even if a few opposition MPs join the cabinet, it will not alter anything. The power remains with the prime minister and she will continue to fulfil her evil desires. The unholy alliance of opposition ministers in the cabinet will only give her additional credibility and legitimacy.
The people of Bangladesh are not so stupid. They will not step into this trap. They will not deviate from their demand for a free and fair election under a non-party care-taker Government. They will maintain their unity and carry forward their demand. They do not want to see another BAKSAL in Bangladesh.
Bangladesh parties head for showdown
The opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party says that, unless the government relinquishes power, its supporters will whip up nationwide strikes that are likely to be bloody. http://www.worldbulletin.org.Dhaka:20.10.2013
Bangladesh’s two main parties are hurtling towards a showdown this week that could delay or even derail elections due by January in a country with a history of ferocious political violence and military intervention.The mounting tension is a fresh threat to Bangladesh’s $22 billion garment export industry, the economic lifeblood of the poor country of 160 million, which has already been rocked by a string of deadly factory accidents over the past year.The ruling Awami League (AL) in 2011 scrapped a “caretaker government” system – whereby neutral leaders take over three months before elections and oversee polls – and is now refusing to step down by Oct. 24, as would have ordinarily happened.
The opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) says that, unless the government relinquishes power, its supporters will whip up nationwide strikes that are likely to be bloody. It is also threatening to boycott the elections.”There will be a total deadlock,” Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, the BNP’s acting secretary-general, told Reuters. “When the government does not listen to our demands, what is the alternative?”The deadlock raises the spectre of aborted polls in 2007, when a League boycott and clashes between rival party supporters led a military-backed government to take over for two years.Even if the polls go ahead, the opposition might reject the results, which could spark more strikes and force a second election within months, as happened in 1996.
“COME ARMED”.Last week, Prime Minister Hasina sought to defuse the crisis, offering the formation of an all-party government to see through the elections.While the BNP is likely to snub her proposal, Alamgir held out the prospect of a negotiated end to the impasse. Still, the BNP has vowed to press ahead with a rally in Dhaka this Friday, for which one party leader has exhorted supporters to come “prepared with arms”.The League plans to hold a competing rally on the same day, raising the risk of more bloodshed, said Mirza Hassan, a political scientist at BRAC University.”This is a very combative move,” said Hassan, whose university is part of Bangladesh’s BRAC group, one of the world’s largest development organisations. “They’re all asking their party people to be out on the street.”Already security forces have killed at least 150 people and more than 2,000 have been injured during strikes and other protests this year, according to Human Rights Watch. Police have banned all gatherings in the capital in the run-up to Friday.
RETAILERS WARY.Factory bosses say that some Western retailers that source apparel from the world’s second-largest clothing exporter after China have put orders on hold to see how the standoff unfolds.”Some of the buyers are taking a back seat because they are waiting to see if there is unrest. If there are problems at the end of October, then maybe they will place orders elsewhere,” said Kutubuddin Ahmed, chairman of the Envoy Group, which exports $200 million worth of garments a year.Bangladesh’s loss could benefit rival exporters Vietnam and Cambodia, even though they are more costly, Ahmed added.Garment orders placed at an annual trade fair in Dhaka this month fell by 5 percent from last October, before a factory blaze and the collapse of Rana Plaza, a building that housed garment workshops, which together killed more than 1,200 people. “The orders fell mainly due to a bad image after the Rana Plaza disaster, as well as the political uncertainty ahead,” said S.M. Mannan, a vice president of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association.
The caretaker system was started in the mid-1990s to ensure fair polls in a country where power has long changed hands between the two dynastic and mutually distrustful parties. Senior League members say they scrapped the arrangement partly because of disputes over whether caretaker government members themselves were unbiased.”It’s time that we go to the normal democratic practices that are used in all other countries,” said H.T. Imam, an adviser to Prime Minister Hasina.But the League’s critics say it wants to stay in power to massage the outcome of an election it is in danger of losing.
The League lost five mayoral elections over the summer, and – according to a July opinion poll conducted by Sydney-based pollster AC Nielsen and U.S.-based consultancy Democracy International – it enjoys the support of just 32 percent of the electorate, 11 percentage points behind the BNP.The ruling party has been tainted by a series of corruption scandals, the most high-profile of which led the World Bank to cancel a $1.2 bn loan for an ambitious bridge project. Ditching the pre-poll caretaker system has also been unpopular.The two parties differ little in terms of policy, analysts say, with voters simply booting out the incumbent with every poll in the hope that change will bring improvement.
WAR CRIMES FLASHPOINT.Another flashpoint between the rivals is a tribunal set up in 2010 to try those accused of human rights abuses during Bangladesh’s war of independence from Pakistan in 1971.The tribunal has so far convicted eight leaders of the BNP and Jamaat-e-Islami, the main Islamic party, sentencing six to death. Another court ruled in August that Jamaat-e-Islami was illegal, barring it from contesting in elections.Both opposition parties have denounced the tribunal as a charade to eliminate the government’s enemies, and more than 100 people have been killed in protests this year following war crime verdicts.If the BNP remains committed to its boycott, international election observers might refuse to monitor and sign off on the polls, as they did after the League backed out in 2007.”The same scenario risks being repeated now,” said BRAC University’s Hassan, referring to the scuppered election of 2007, though he added that the army may be reluctant to step in again after a difficult and unpopular two years in charge.”If the AL goes to these polls unilaterally, there will be violence and then what will the army do?” he said. “One scenario is that they are forced to come in.”