Why the Sunday Times has a lot of explaining to do
Bangladesh, an authoritarian regime, notorious for arbitrary detentions, false cases, extra judicial killings and disappearances would not seem the ideal source for a supposed expose in the Sunday Times claiming that a businessman who has lived in the UK for ten years was in fact a jihadist “terrorist”, and “arms dealer”.
But this did little to deter Tom Harper, the Sunday Time’s Home Affairs Correspondent from making such an allegation against Shahid Uddin Khan, a former colonel in the Bangladesh army in a report published late last month.
If the provenance of the allegations did not itself raise alarm bells about their integrity (and one assumes that for the Sunday Times, it did not) all that Harper had to do was to read an Al Jazeera investigation published in March which explained how Khan, far from being a “Jihadist” and “terrorist”, had been good friends and business partners with Tarique Ahmed Siddique, the security adviser to the Bangladesh prime minister and indeed the uncle of British parliamentarian Tulip Siddique MP. For ten years between 2009 and 2018, Siddique and Khan’s families jointly owned a land company in Bangladesh with Siddique’s wife as the chairperson and Khan the managing director.
As Al Jazeera explained, the absurd Bangladesh government allegations against Khan only arose as Khan has since 5 April 2018, the day after they closed down their joint company, been the subject of a vendetta by Siddique, presumably to keep Khan quiet and to hide Siddique’s family involvement in it.
The Sunday Times article should know that giving any credibility to allegations of the sort it received from the Bangladesh government/intelligence agencies or their intermediaries without doing significant due diligence was not just pure folly – but reckless defamation. It is not enough for the Sunday Times to simply receive allegations, call Khan and get him to deny them – when any level of due diligence would have easily have indicated to the Sunday Times that the original allegations have no foundation.