A Joint Statement by the Asian Legal Resource Centre and Odhikar on Universal Periodic Review on Bangladesh

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ALRC-STM-002-2013
April 29, 2013
A Joint Statement by the Asian Legal Resource Centre and Odhikar on Universal Periodic
Review on Bangladesh
BANGLADESH: Government suppressed truth to the UPR Session

Bangladesh participated in the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process at the UN Human Rights
Council on 29 April 2013 in the 16th Session of the UPR Working Group in Geneva, Switzerland.
The Government’s delegation led by Foreign Minister Dr. Dipu Moni presented Bangladesh’s
national report during the second cycle of the UPR process under the UN human rights
mechanisms.
The Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC) and Odhikar participated in the UPR Session and found
that the Government in its national report to the UPR process suppressed the truth to the UN and to
the international community.
Foreign Minister Dipu Moni reiterated that her government maintains “zero tolerance” this time, as
she did in 2009 during the first cycle of the UPR, without any substantiated proof and without the
corroborating facts regarding the prosecution and conviction of the perpetrators of the lawenforcing agencies for committing gross human rights violations, such as extrajudicial killings and
custodial torture. Odhikar’s documentation records that at least 539 persons have been extrajudicially killed between the first cycle and second cycle of the UPR process. Not a single case of
extrajudicial killings has yet been credibly investigated, leading to prosecution and trial, during the
period between the two sessions of the UPR.
The Minister claimed that enforced disappearance does not take place in Bangladesh and there is no
law defining ‘enforced disappearance’ in the country’s legal jurisdiction. She claimed that there are
incidents of kidnapping by ‘criminals’ personifying themselves as law enforcement agencies. This
was the government’s attempt to undermine the importance of administering justice to a number of
families in the guise of legal jargon. In reality, enforced disappearance is increasing in Bangladesh.
The number has reached up to 81 during this period. It has taken the form of a new pattern of
violation perpetrated by the agents of the State. The families of the disappeared face constant
denials by the law-enforcing agents whenever there are attempts to register complaints. The 2
Foreign Minister has, in fact, echoed the same type of denials at the UN regarding the fearful reality
of enforced disappearance in the country. There is no remedy available for the alleged enforced
disappearances from within the criminal justice system, due to the regrettable roles played by the
state attorneys and the judiciary.
The Bangladesh government has claimed that the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is
empowered to conduct investigations and to institute litigations. In reality, the NHRC’s
recommendations to the government do not have any binding effect, according to the law.
Moreover, the recruitment of persons having loyalty to the government in the NHRC has made this
rights body one of the most ineffective institutions of the country. The NHRC is incapable of
conducting credible investigations in cases of human rights abuse. It has constantly failed to fight
any human rights causes that could meet normative principles of internationally recognised human
rights. For example, the NHRC’s previous body compelled the Ministry of Home Affairs to conduct
credible probe into only two cases of extra-judicial killings during its tenure. By the time the probe
reports were prepared, the incumbent body assumed office. Since then, the reports have been
shelved. The NHRC did not proceed with the reports leading to prosecution of the perpetrators of
the Rapid Action Battalion. There has not been any credible investigation conducted by the current
leadership of the NHRC regarding gross human rights violations, such as torture, enforced
disappearance, and extrajudicial killings by committed by state agents, let alone filing litigation
before any Court.
The Foreign Minister claims that the Parliament, in its 15th amendment to the Constitution, has
made constitutional reforms. In reality, the Constitution’s 15th amendment, has barred any future
amendment to the constitution, and has made provisions for a set of parliamentarians to be elected
before ninety days of the dissolution of the sitting Parliament, keeping it active, which is
unprecedented and has caused tremendous constitutional and political crisis in the country.
The Bangladesh government’s report claims that the 9th Parliament passed 196 legislations to
address political, socio-economic, and cultural rights of the people, especially women, children,
ethnic minorities, and workers. This claim is invalid as laws like the Anti-Terrorism Act (2009) has
been used to curtail rights of personal liberty, freedom of association and assembly. Anyone who
criticises the illegal actions of the government is subject to face repression by the State under the
Anti Terrorism Act (2009), Cyber Crimes Act (2006) and fabricated sedition cases under the penal
laws.
The government’s report claims that the Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority and its
decisions are binding on all subordinate courts, executives, and judicial authorities. However, it has
been proven that Bangladesh has a flawed and dysfunctional criminal justice system, which
constantly fails to hold the country’s coercive and lethal police and paramilitary forces accountable.
The incapable criminal justice system continuously contributes to the disastrous human rights
realities in the country.3
The government claims that it demonstrated human rights commitment by adopting a number of
policies for promotion and protection of human rights. For example, it claims that the National
Labour Policy, 2011, protects and promotes the rights of the workers. If the government had any
respect for the rights of the workers, state authorities would not have ‘disappeared’ Aminul Islam, a
labour leader, whose dead body was recovered from a roadside ditch at Ashulia in Dhaka, for
demanding increased wages and benefits for workers of ready-made garments sector, where the
minimum wages of the workers is around $ USD 45 per month. Hundreds of workers of the readymade garment sector alone have been killed in fires and building collapses on several occasions,
due to the collapsed rule of law system and entrenched corruption in Bangladesh.
The Minister, in her presentation, claimed that the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) has gained
public confidence by summoning ministers, and members of parliament. It is publicly known in
Bangladesh that the ACC summoned the ministers and parliamentarians’ to certify them as ‘noncorrupt persons’ in the name of completing eyewash investigations. For example, in 2009, after
assuming office, the current government began a spree of withdrawing criminal cases. The process
started with withdrawing 12 criminal cases, including corruption cases, against the Prime Minister.
On 22 April 2013, the ACC, through its prosecutor, submitted a petition to the Appellate Division
of the Supreme Court seeking withdrawal of a pending corruption case against a member of
parliament of the ruling party. This pattern of withdrawing the corruption cases reflects the level of
commitment of combating corruption and establishing the rule of law maintained by the incumbent
government and the ACC.
The National Election Commission is one problem center in Bangladesh, as every ruling party
invests their best efforts to manipulate the weakness of the institution, which is still under the
control of the Office of the Prime Minister.
The Minister has claimed that the authorities have given licence to 14 new private television
channels and several community radio channels and that the media enjoys freedom of expression,
which contradicts the facts on the ground. All the media that have received licence during the
current government’s tenure are entrepreneurs having direct attachments with the ruling political
parties. The government has created such an atmosphere that the media has to maintain selfcensorship in publishing reports and criticizing the authorities, while the dissident voices suffer
closure and various forms of repression such as , threats over telephone or in person by the
intelligence agencies, harassment in fabricated criminal cases, arbitrary detention, and extra-legal
convictions by the judiciary.
The executive authorities neither implement the laws related to addressing the incidence of violence
against women, nor do the victims get any recourse under the flawed and dysfunctional criminal
justice system. There is no protection mechanism for victims and witnesses in the country.4
The ethnic, religious and linguistic minority communities continuously remain vulnerable and at
risk of attacks and harassment due to the absence of any mechanism to protect their fundamental
rights as citizens.
The NGOs of Bangladesh that maintain and advocate for the normative principles and standards of
universally recognized human rights often face serious threats and repression from the state.
Human rights defenders and organizations, who document the cases of torture, extrajudicial
killings, enforced disappearances, illegal arrests, and arbitrary detentions, face cancellation of
government’s approval followed by regular surveillance by state-agents, harassment, and telephone
threats.
# # #
About Odhikar: House No. 35 (3rd Floor), Road No. 117, Gulshan, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh, Tel:
+880 2 9888587, Fax: +880 2 9886208, Email: odhikar.bd@gmail.com, Website: www.odhikar.org
Odhikar, meaning ‘rights’ in the Bangla language, is a human rights organization based in Dhaka,
Bangladesh. A group of human rights defenders established this organisation in October 1994 to
create a wider monitoring and awareness raising system on the abuse of civil and political rights in
Bangladesh. The rights group contributes to policy advocacy aiming to address the contemporary
human rights situation in Bangladesh. It is registered as an NGO with the NGO Affairs Bureau of
the Government of Bangladesh, bearing registration no. 924, 1995. Odhikar has special consultative
ECOSOC status at the United Nations.
——————
About the Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC): 701A Westley Square, 48 Hoi Yuen Road,
Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hongkong, China; Tel: +852 26986339; Email: alrc@alrc.net; Website:
www.alrc.net. The Asian Legal Resource Centre is an independent regional non-governmental
organisation holding general consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the
United Nations. It is the sister organisation of the Asian Human Rights Commission. The Hong
Kong-based group seeks to strengthen and encourage positive action on legal and human rights
issues at the local and national levels throughout Asia.
Read this News online: http://www.humanrights.asia/news/alrc-news/ALRC-STM-002-2013

Source: Odhikar